Report a Policy Violation
<3
©2008-2009 =Qinni
Details
Submitted: February 11, 2008
File Size: 30.7 KB
Image Size: 30.7 KB
Resolution: 99×56
Comments: Disabled
Favourites & Collections: 970 [who?]
Views
Total: 9,829
Today: 2
Downloads
Total: 91
Today: 0
Thumb
Submitted: February 11, 2008
File Size: 30.7 KB
Image Size: 30.7 KB
Resolution: 99×56
Comments: Disabled
Favourites & Collections: 970 [who?]
Views
Total: 9,829
Today: 2
Downloads
Total: 91
Today: 0
Thumb
Artist's Comments
Edit again: the popular system has changed more for the better. deviations are no longer fixed on the front page until the end of the 24hour period. i am also happy that i've found many new artists with this system. i'll just leave this for those who still supports the old system ^^
this is a witty summary of this whole situation, if you dont get it/want to read it. it's halarious: [link]
[Edit] There is now a petition for a change: [link] i cross my fingers and hope that this works out somehow >.<;[/edit]
now i'm not saying there's anything wrong with the idea of "fairness exposure". however, it went off with a bad start (with the whole screenshot issue), and now i just dont like browsing anymore.
i personally think that it's a great idea with all the good intentions, but it's a system easily abused and i think the old "Brows Popular" can work side-by-side with "Fair Exposure" compromise, people~!
here's my two cents:
i know it must be hard work for the coders to do all that, but right now many artists who happens to submit under the same catagory as popular artists are pushed even furthur down the latter. thus the "fair exposure" is not very fair for them. in the end, popular artists will remain popular and this is just a system that makes art that are not so great be on the top through unused catagories while better and unknown artists are still stuck at the bottom.
...and i miss browsing through with raw favs (the number of favs) because everything just looked better to me....more times than now....
If you support for the old system to be back (i'm sure a compromisation could be made with this), please pass it along or something. thumb number's on the side bottom for subscribers.
used the template here: [link] by ~zilla (so disclaimer on the template)
if you dont agree..uh...please make your own stamp
thanks ^^~
Edit: i'm disabling comments cause i'm gonna be away from dA for a bit...and dont wanna answer to/see a lot of them right now ._. i'm hoping that when i come back some good can come out of this >.<;~
this is a witty summary of this whole situation, if you dont get it/want to read it. it's halarious: [link][Edit] There is now a petition for a change: [link] i cross my fingers and hope that this works out somehow >.<;[/edit] now i'm not saying there's anything wrong with the idea of "fairness exposure". however, it went off with a bad start (with the whole screenshot issue), and now i just dont like browsing anymore.
i personally think that it's a great idea with all the good intentions, but it's a system easily abused and i think the old "Brows Popular" can work side-by-side with "Fair Exposure" compromise, people~!
here's my two cents:
i know it must be hard work for the coders to do all that, but right now many artists who happens to submit under the same catagory as popular artists are pushed even furthur down the latter. thus the "fair exposure" is not very fair for them. in the end, popular artists will remain popular and this is just a system that makes art that are not so great be on the top through unused catagories while better and unknown artists are still stuck at the bottom.
...and i miss browsing through with raw favs (the number of favs) because everything just looked better to me....more times than now....
If you support for the old system to be back (i'm sure a compromisation could be made with this), please pass it along or something. thumb number's on the side bottom for subscribers.
used the template here: [link] by ~zilla (so disclaimer on the template)
if you dont agree..uh...please make your own stamp
thanks ^^~Edit: i'm disabling comments cause i'm gonna be away from dA for a bit...and dont wanna answer to/see a lot of them right now ._. i'm hoping that when i come back some good can come out of this >.<;~
Site Map
Community News84 So i herd u liek emotes?? - Volume 39^Synfull
 reports, 1d 11h ago39th volume in a weekly series focused on promoting emotes and emoticonists from the dA community 82 78 Photography Rules for Complete Idiots^kkart
 reports, 22h 19m agolol some of these are just downright hysterical! 47 Daily Lit Deviations for July 4, 2009*DailyLitDeviations
 reports, 1d 7h agoDaily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it. Each day we will feature 10 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article. In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you  the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community. |
PollWhat would you like to see planned for deviantART's 9th birthday on August 7th, 2009? |
deviantART Loves You
Deviously serving the art and skin community for 3,254 days.
Only 33 days until our ninth birthday!
|
Deviousness
When it comes to community spirit, `Rushy is a shining example. From participating in devmeets, to providing positive encouragement to other artists, `Rushy can always be found demonstrating what it really takes to be a true deviant. It's without any hesitation that we are delighted to award the Deviousness Award for July 2009 to `Rushy Read More
|
Show them your love!
Follow us on Twitter
Become a fan on Facebook
©2009 deviantART. All rights reserved
